Discussion:
Report: Biden Admin Sent Israel 'At Least' 15,000 2,000-Pound Bombs
(too old to reply)
D. Ray
2024-06-29 09:31:20 UTC
Permalink
🇺🇸🇮🇱🇵🇸 The Biden administration has sent Israel "at least" 14,000
MK-84 2,000-pound bombs and 1,000 bunker-busters, according to a new report
from Reuters.
"Between the war's start last October and recent days, the United States
has transferred at least 14,000 of the MK-84 2,000-pound bombs, 6,500
500-pound bombs, 3,000 Hellfire precision-guided air-to-ground missiles,
1,000 bunker-buster bombs, 2,600 air-dropped small-diameter bombs, and other munitions..."
As I reported last week, Netanyahu is now trying to blame Israel's failure
to achieve any of their main objectives in Gaza on the Biden
administration's decision to delay one single shipment of bunker-busters.

No doubt killing a few thousand more kids with US-supplied bunker busters
would have secured Israel a total victory!

<https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64515>

<https://archive.ph/Zcwef>
NoSpamPlease
2024-06-29 10:53:49 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@news.usenet.farm>,
D. Ray <***@ray> wrote:

[vigorous Hamas suck-off flushed]

Report on Hamas' use of human shields in Gaza
https://stratcomcoe.org/cuploads/pfiles/hamas_human_shields.pdf

Hamas' most common uses of human shields include:

* Firing rockets, artillery, and mortars from or in proximity to heavily
populated civilian areas, often from or near facilities which should be
protected according to the Geneva Convention (e.g. schools, hospitals,
or mosques).

* Locating military or security-related infrastructures such as HQs, bases,
armouries, access routes, lathes or defensive positions within or in proximity
to civilian areas.

* Protecting terrorists' houses and military facilities, or rescuing terrorists
who were besieged or warned by the IDF.

* Combating the IDF from or in proximity to residential and commercial areas,
including using civilians for intelligence gathering missions.

By engaging in these acts, Hamas employs a win-win scenario: if indeed the IDF
uses kinetic power, and the number of civilian causalities surges, Hamas can
use that as a weapon in the lawfare it conducts. It would be able to accuse
the IDF (and Israel) of committing war crimes, which in turn could result in
the imposition of a wide array of sanctions. On the other hand, if the IDF limits
its use of military power in Gaza to avoid collateral damage, Hamas will be less
vulnerable to Israeli attacks, and thereby able to protect its assets while
continuing to fight.
Jeffery Kikestein
2024-06-29 22:56:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by NoSpamPlease
[vigorous Hamas suck-off flushed]
Report on Hamas' use of human shields in Gaza
https://stratcomcoe.org/cuploads/pfiles/hamas_human_shields.pdf
* Firing rockets, artillery, and mortars from or in proximity to heavily
populated civilian areas, often from or near facilities which should be
protected according to the Geneva Convention (e.g. schools, hospitals,
or mosques).
* Locating military or security-related infrastructures such as HQs,
bases, armouries, access routes, lathes or defensive positions within or
in proximity to civilian areas.
* Protecting terrorists' houses and military facilities, or rescuing
terrorists who were besieged or warned by the IDF.
* Combating the IDF from or in proximity to residential and commercial
areas, including using civilians for intelligence gathering missions.
By engaging in these acts, Hamas employs a win-win scenario: if indeed
the IDF uses kinetic power, and the number of civilian causalities
surges, Hamas can use that as a weapon in the lawfare it conducts. It
would be able to accuse the IDF (and Israel) of committing war crimes,
which in turn could result in the imposition of a wide array of
sanctions. On the other hand, if the IDF limits its use of military power
in Gaza to avoid collateral damage, Hamas will be less vulnerable to
Israeli attacks, and thereby able to protect its assets while continuing
to fight.
Israel needs the big US nukes so they can nuke Gaza in a spectacular act of
self-immolation.

Would anyone really miss "the holy land" if it was a radioactive sheet of
glass with a 20000 year halflife?

Loading...